Pengajuan Grasi yang Berulang-ulang dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam

  • Santoso Santoso Sumbersari Cowek Purwodadi Pasuruan
Keywords: Clemency, Islamic Criminal Law

Abstract

The paper aims to answer questions about how the procedure for filing clemency under Law No. 22 of 2002, as well as what are the consequences of repeatedly filing clemency by death convicts, and how Islamic law evaluates it. The results of this study concluded that the procedure for filing clemency according to Law no. 22 of 2002 creates more legal certainty for convicts who want to apply for clemency regarding the requirements and the time frame, because it stipulates the timeframe and procedures for completing the clemency request for each agency. Meanwhile, repeated applications for clemency will have an impact on the convict's psyche, because the submission is not necessarily accepted. What is clear is that the legal process will be protracted, then hinders the enforcement of the rule of law. Whereas in Islamic law, clemency is up to the victim's guardian, whether to accept or reject his apology. Whereas in Islamic law, the exclusion postponed is only when the guardian is in a crazy state and is not yet mature, then waiting to recover and mature

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahma, Muh.Nur. “Kelemahan KUHAP yang Membiarkan Korban di Luar Sistem.” Wahyu dan Akal - Iman dan Ilmu, Nopember 2019. http://waii-hmna.blogspot.com/2007/09/794-kelemahan-kuhap-yang-membiarkan.html.

Admin. “Politik Hukum.” Diakses 31 Januari 2020. http://kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0703/16/Politikhukum/3387409.htm.

———. “Sebuah Tatapan Masa Depan Islam.” Diakses 21 Januari 2020. http://www.albarokah.or.id/berita/kajian/sebuah-tatapan-masa-depan-islam.html.

Alim, Muhammad. Demokrasi dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konsstitusi Madina dan UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: UII Pers, 2001.

Al-Mawardi, dan Fadli Bahri. Al-Ahkam As-Sulthaniyyah. Jakarta: Darul Falah, 2006.

Ashfiya, Dzikry Gaosul, dan Anna Erliyana. “Clemencial Review oleh Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Telaah Kritis Keputusan Presiden tentang Pemberian Grasi dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil di Indonesia).” PALAR: Pakuan Law Review 6, no. 1 (Januari 2020).

Azhari, Muhammad Tahir. Negara Hukum: Suatu Studi tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya Dilihat dari Segi Hukum Islam: Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2003.

Busrah, Abu Bakar. Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1985.

Departemen Agama RI. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahan. Bandung: CV. Diponegoro, 2010.

Djazuli, A. Fiqih Jinayah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.

Irawan, R. Bagus. “Hak Konstitusional Presiden dalam Memberikan Grasi dan Pelaksanan di Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1, no. 2 (September 2016).

Jonkers. Hukum Pidana Hindia Belanda. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1987.

Mubarok, Nafi’. Suplemen Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel, 2017.

Nurpian, Masan. “Pengujian Keputusan Presiden tentang Grasi.” Rechts Vinding 7, no. 1 (April 2018).

Rahmat, Hakim. Hukum Pidana Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2000.

Salmi, Akhiar. Eksistensi Hukuman Mati. Jakarta: Aksara Persada, 1985.

Soedarti, Tutik Rahayuningsih. “Penolakan Grasi dan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi bagi Terpidana Mati.” Jurnal Penelitian Dinamika Sosial, 2005.

Yuwono, Tisno. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Arkola, t.t.

Published
2020-09-12
Section
Articles