Journal of Comparative Madhahib and Thought http://jurnalfsh.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/JCMT <p><a>Original Title :</a> <strong>Journal of Comparative Madhahib and Thought</strong><br /><a>Indonesian Title :</a> Jurnal Perbandingan Madzhab dan Pemikiran<br /><a>Short Title : </a>JCiMT<br /><a>Abbreviation : </a>JCMT<br /><a>Frequency : </a>2 issues per year (June and December)<br /><a>Number of :</a> 7 research articles and reviews per issue<br /><a>Articles per Issue</a> <br /><a>DOI :</a> -<br /><a>ISSN :</a> - (Printed); - (Online)<br /><a>Editor-in-Chief : </a><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=vNZ8g-kAAAAJ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Imron Mustofa</a><br /><a>Publisher :</a> Department of Comparative Madhab, Faculty of Sharia and<br /> Law, State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel Surabaya<br /> St. Ahmad Yani 117 Surabaya, East Java 60237, Indonesia.<br /><a>Language :</a> English and Bahasa Indonesia<br /><a>Citation Analysis :</a> <a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qmJTm1kAAAAJ&amp;hl=en&amp;authuser=3&amp;citsig=AMD79oq74s_qGF_mARzQDl5b-MhcyRToZQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Scholars</a>, <a href="https://www.onesearch.id/Repositories/Repository?library_id=4254" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Indonesia Onesearch (IOS)</a><br /><a>Subject Area, :</a> Law and Religious Studies <br /><a>Category</a> <br /><a>Discipline :</a> Islamic Schools, Islamic law, Islamic Thought.<br />All submitted papers are subject to review of the editors, editorial board, and blind reviewers. Submissions that violate our guidelines on formatting or length will be rejected without review.</p> Department of Comparative Madhab, Fakulty of Shariah and Law en-US Journal of Comparative Madhahib and Thought Analisis Fatwa Jabatan Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia Irsyad Al-Fatwa Ke 94 dengan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2009 Tentang Otopsi Jenazah http://jurnalfsh.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/JCMT/article/view/1186 <p><em>Autopsy is still unacceptable in the Islamic community. It is considered an act that hurts and destroys a corpse and also against Islamic law. The problem in this research is how the legal istinbāṭ method of autopsy for bodies according to the position of the 94th Mufti of the Malaysian Alliance Region Ersyad Al-Fatwa and the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council Number 6 of 2009 and how to compare the Position of the Mufti of the Malaysian Alliance Region, Irsyad Al-Fatwa 94 with the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council on legal istinbāṭ for autopsy bodies? This study is comparative study. The results, the Malaysian Association of Territory Mufti has determined that initially, it is legal to carry out an autopsy of a corpse to be permissible. Then it is legal to autopsy a body based on certain circumstances. The Indonesian Ulama Council also enforces the law on the autopsy of bodies as it must be based on certain circumstances. In a situation where a corpse autopsy is performed in order to save a still-living fetus in the womb of the corpse, it is mandatory.</em></p> Mohd Asrul Hamdani Abdul Kholiq Syafa’at Copyright (c) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2021-06-28 2021-06-28 1 1 1 19 Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur dan David S. Powers Tentang Hukum Waris Islam http://jurnalfsh.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/JCMT/article/view/1162 <p><em>The thought of Islamic law always develops along with changing times, places, and social conditions, and this cannot be separated from the approach applied by every scientist in performing ijtihad. This article reveals a comparative study between Muhammad Syahrur and David S. Powers, who have different backgrounds in interpreting the law, especially inheritance. Syahrur has formal educational experience in the field of engineering. In turn, he studied Islam intensely, while Powers is indeed formally educated in the Islamic world, and although they both use different approaches, they almost have the same view. For Syahrur, there is no absolute specific percentage limit in wills, but the number of wills can be determined by the choices based on the best conditions, in his opinion. Likewise, with inheritance law, the 2: 1 rule for men and women is also not absolute. Under certain conditions, the distribution of property can be 1: 1. Meanwhile, Powers, this testamentary term, is increasingly related to Shahrur's inheritance. It is just that it is intended for heirs whom Ashabul Furudh blocks. Another term that Powers introduced was inheritance ab intestine which was no different from Shahrur's thought. However, it was valid for 2: 1 if the heir was in primary status and 1: 1 if the heir was in the second position.</em></p> Muhammad Jazil Rifqi Copyright (c) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 1 1 20 36