Analisis Model Diversi Melalui Restorative Justice Pada Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah

Authors

  • Mohammad Farid Fad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2019.9.1.52-89

Keywords:

restorative justice, diversion, terorism, maq?shid al-syar?’ah

Abstract

The act of terrorism involving children certainly raises its own concerns. How not, if the child is faced with a formal justice process then besides he will lose his independence, he will also lose his future because of stigmatization as a terrorist who is attached for life. However, if the model of diversion through restorative justice is adopted, the legal process will be blocked by the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System. Then what is the meeting point between the two? How is this diversion approach in the perspective of Maqashid al-Shari'ah? This article tries to describe the diversion model through a restorative justice approach in the perspective of maqashid al-shari'ah. The type of method used in this study is a qualitative method. The data collection technique used is library research sourced from various literatures such as books, books and journal articles. After the data is collected, an analysis will be carried out using descriptive-analytical methods. This study concludes that restorative justice through a diversion model is in line with the principles of maqashid al-syari'ah, this legal approach aims to help children of terrorists realize, feel and restore humanitarian relations that were damaged between the perpetrators and victims. This is due to the fact that the child of the terrorist is not an actor in the real sense, but he is the real victim of the results of his parents' indoctrination or other parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abintoro. Prakoso. Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Surabaya: Laksbang Grafika, 2013.
Ananda. Fiska. “Penerapan Diversi sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana”. Jurnal Daulat Hukum. Vol. 1 No. 1 Maret 2018.
Braithwaite. John. Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Danielt. Reyner Timothy. Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Bawah Umur, Lex et Societas, Vol. II, No.6/ Juli 2014.
Dellyana. Shanty. Wanita Dan Anak Di Mata Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988.
Djamil. Nasir. Anak Bukan Untuk Di Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
E.. Stanley Grupp. Theories of Punishment. London: Indiana University Press, 1971.
Ediwarman. Peradilan Anak di Persimpangan Jalan dalam Perspektif Victimologi (Belajar dari Kasus Raju). Jurnal Mahkamah Vol. 18 No. 1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lancakuning. Pekanbaru: 2006.
Fabry. Rio. “Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas dengan Pelaku Anak”. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Magister. Lampung: Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung, 2016.
Firdaus. Aras. “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Seksual Melalui Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak (Juvenile justice System)”, USU Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3, Juni 2016.
Gultom. Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2014.
Hoyle. Chris Cunneen and Carolyn. Debating Restorative Justice. United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2010.
Human Rights Watch. Children Behind Bars. The Global Overuse of Detention of Children, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/children-behind-bars.
Immarigeon. Daly K. and R.. “The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice: Some Critical Reflections.”, The Contemporary Justice Review 1, 1998.
Kartman. Katherine Beckett and Martina. Violence, Mass Incarceration and Restorative Justice: Promising Possibilities, University of Washington: June 20, 2016.
Marlina. “Penerapan Konsep Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak”. Jurnal Equality, Vol. 13 No. 1 2008.
_______. Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Cet. 1. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
________. Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restroative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana. Cet. 1. USU Press: 2010.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Mulyadi. Lilik. Wajah Sistem Peradilan Anak, Bandung: Alumni, 2014.
Prakoso. Djoko. Kedudukan Justisiable di dalam KUHAP. Jakarta: Ghalia Inonesia. 1986.
Pratiwi. Debby Naztty. “Balancing The Interests of Child Offenders and Child Victims through Diversion in Child-on-Child Crime: Evaluation through The International Children’s Rights Legal Framework (In The Context of Indonesia Juvenile Justice System)”. Thesis. Leiden: University Faculty of Law, 2017-2018.
Priyatno. Dwidja. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2006.
_____________. Wajah Hukum Pidana Asas dan Perkembangan. Bekasi: Gramata Publishing, 2012.
Riadi. Selamet. “Peran Penyidik Polri dalam Penerapan Diversi terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (Studi di PPA Polres Lombok Barat)”. Jurnal IUS, Vol IV Nomor 2, Agustus 2016.
Sambas. Nandang. Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010.
Setiyaningrum. Anita Indah. “Diversi sebagai Bentuk Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Oleh Penyidik Polda Jawa Tengah”. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 12 no. 4 Desember 2017.
Shelden. Randall G.. Detention Diversion Advocacy; an Evaluation. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1997.
Soepeno. Kriminalisasi Anak. Jakarta, 2010.
Tanamas. M. Joni & Zulchaina Z.. Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Konvensi Hak Anak. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.
Thompson. Jack E. Bynum and Wiliam E.. Juvenile Delinquency a Sociological Approach, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
UNICEF. Child Protection Information Sheet. Child Protection Information Sheet, 2006.
United Nations. Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes. New York: United Nations Publication, 2006.
Wahyudi. Setya. Implementasi Ide Diversi dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011.
Wicaksono. Adi Hardiyanto. “Kebijakan Pelaksanaan Diversi Sebagai Perlindungan Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum Pada Tingkat Penuntutan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kudus”. Jurnal Law Reform, Volume 11 Nomor 1 Tahun 2015.
Widayati. Kunti. “Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan anak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2002”. Socioscientia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, September 2016, Volume 8 Nomor 2.
Widiarta. G.. “Ide Keadilan Restoratif Pada Kebijakan Penanggulangan kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga dengan Hukum Pidana”. Ringkasan Disertasi. Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 2011.
Yunus. Yutirsa. “Analisis Konsep Restorative Justice mellaui Sistem Diversi dalam SIstem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia”. Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Volume 2 No. 2 Agustus 2013.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-23

How to Cite

Fad, M. F. . (2019). Analisis Model Diversi Melalui Restorative Justice Pada Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 9(1), 52–89. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2019.9.1.52-89

Issue

Section

Articles