Revocation of The Attachment III of The Presidential Regulation Number 10 of 2021 in The Perspective of Human Rights and Maqasid Al-Shari‘ah

Authors

  • Sanuri Sanuri UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.1.1-32

Abstract

This research is based on a decision of the President of the Republic of Indonesia, Joko Widodo, by revoking the Attachment III of the Presidential Regulation Number 10 of 2021 concerning the business sector of investment in the liquor and alcoholic drink industry. This presidential decree attracts a wide attention from all levels of Indonesian society. Most of them welcome the decision, and a few are more optimistic about the implementation of the presidential regulation because it has actually offered a clear and proportional regulation. To get a sharp analysis result, the researcher looks at this constitutional fact through the theory of human rights and maqasid al-shari’ah. Based on the research results, it is stated that the decision of the President of the Republic of Indonesia by abolishing the presidential regulation is in line with the basic values ​​and principles contained in human rights and maqasid al-shari’ah. Even so, there are some basic rights points that need serious attention from the government, particularly how to revive the people’s economy which is teetering due to the Covid-19 pandemic. At least, this is the reason for arguing for groups who are oppossing to the presidential decision.

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertumpu pada sebuah keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia, Joko Widodo, dengan mencabut Lampiran III Peraturan Presiden Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 tentang bidang usaha penanaman modal dan investasi industri minuman keras dan minuman beralkohol. Keputusan presiden ini cukup mengundang perhatian dari seluruh lapisan masyarakat Indonesia. Sebagian besar dari mereka menyambut gembira keputusan itu, dan sebagian kecil lebih optimis dengan pemberlakuan peraturan presiden itu karena sebenarnya telah menawarkan suatu regulasi yang jelas dan proporsional. Untuk mendapatkan hasil analisis yang tajam, peneliti melihat fakta konstitusi ini melalui teori Hak Asasi Manusia dan maqasid al-shari’ah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa keputusan yang diambil Presiden Republik Indonesia dengan menghapus peraturan presiden itu sejalan dengan nilai-nilai dan prinsip-prinsip dasar yang tertuang dalam hak asasi manusia dan maqasid al-shari’ah. Meskipun demikian, ada beberapa poin hak-hak dasar yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius dari pemerintah terutama bagaimana membangkitkan perekonomian rakyat yang tertatih-tatih akibat pandemic Covid-19. Setidaknya, inilah yang menjadi alasan mendasar kelompok yang berseberangan dengan keputusan presiden tersebut.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Kompress, 2005.

Auda, Jasser. “A Maqasidi Approach to Contemporary Application of the Shari’ah.” Intellectual Discourse 19, no. 1 (2011).

———. Maqasid al-Shari’ah as philosophy of Islamic Law, A Systems Approach. London-Wasinthong: IIIT, 2008.

Fahmal, Muin. Peran Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Layak dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Bersih. Yogyakarta: UII Pers, 2006.

Gtp. “Pakar Nilai Jokowi Tergesa-gesa Cabut Lampiran Perpres Soal Investasi Miras,” 3 Maret 2021. https://www.dw.com/id/pakar-nilai-jokowi-tergesa-gesa-cabut-izin-investasi-miras/a-56752862.

Indonesian Ulema Council. “The Attachment of the Fatwa Number 11 MUI of 2009,” t.t.

Permana, Cecep Eka. Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Baduy dalam Mengatasi Bencana. Jakarta: Wedatama Widia Sastra, 2010.

Putra, Dwi Aditya. “Fakta-Fakta Lampiran Perpres 10/2021 soal Investasi Miras yang Dicabut Jokowi,” 2 Maret 202M. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4496269/fakta-fakta-lampiran-perpres-102021-soal-investasi-miras-yang-dicabut-jokowi.

Ryh. “Data Kecelakaan Lalin Akibat Miras, Ratusan Tewas 2019-2020,” 2 Maret 2021. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20210302104302-384-612531/data-kecelakaan-lalin-akibat-miras-ratusan-tewas-2019-2020.

Sabon, Max Boli. Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2014.

Subki, ‘Abd al-Wahhab Ibn ‘Ali al-. Al-Ashbah wa al-Nazair. Disunting oleh ‘Abd Mawjud. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1991.

The Government of the Republic of Indonesia. “The Attachment of the Law Number 11 of 2020,” t.t.

———. “The Attachment of the Law Number 25 of 2007,” t.t.

———. “The Attachment of the Law Number 39 of 1999,” t.t.

———. “The Attachment of the Presidential Regulation Number 10 of 2021,” t.t.

———. “The Attachment of the Presidential Regulation Number 44 of 2016,” t.t.

———. “The Attachment of the Presidential Regulation Number 76 of 2007,” t.t.

Tim Editor. “Untung Rugi Investasi Miras di 4 Provinsi,” 1 Maret 2021. https://kumparan.com/berita-bisnis/untung-rugi-investasi-miras-di-4-provinsi-1vGtTR43q7N.

Ulfa. “Untung Rugi Investasi Miras di Tengah Penolakan Masyarakat CNN Indonesia,” 1 Maret 2021. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20210301113524-92-612095/untung-rugi-investasi-miras-di-tengah-penolakan-masyarakat.

Yanwardhana, Emir. “Sederet Alasan Jokowi Cabut Lampiran Perpres Investasi Miras,” 3 Maret 2021. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210303090101-17-227420/sederet-alasan-jokowi-cabut-lampiran-perpres-investasi-miras.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

Sanuri, Sanuri. 2021. “Revocation of The Attachment III of The Presidential Regulation Number 10 of 2021 in The Perspective of Human Rights and Maqasid Al-Shari‘ah”. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 24 (1):1-32. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.1.1-32.