@article{Al Hadi_2020, title={Hadis sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam}, volume={23}, url={https://jurnalfsh.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/qanun/article/view/1129}, DOI={10.15642/alqanun.2020.23.2.316-339}, abstractNote={<p>Hadith as the basis of Islamic law does not consist of all forms of hadith, even though its veracity has been shown by the Koran. The scholars’ from among Muhaddithin, Usuliyyin, and Fuqaha’, have formulated the basics of hadith hujjahan, namely <em>al-hadith al-maqbulah</em> (hadith accepted as a source of Islamic law) and <em>al-hadith al-mardudah</em> (a hadith that is rejected as a source of Islamic law). According to them, the hadith of al-<em>Maqbul</em> must be based on the principle of rejecting or accepting a hadith narration, that is, it must be narrated by a narrator who is <em>’adil</em> and <em>dabit</em>, and in that hadith status there is no’ <em>illah al-qadihah</em> (severe disability) and the narrator does not experience <em>shudud</em> (peculiar). Muhaddithi n takes the stance to accept all hadiths, both <em>sahih, hasan</em> and <em>da’if</em> to be practiced, except in a position that is not too weak (<em>da’if</em>). But that is not the attitude of Usuliyyin ’, and Fuqaha’, they took the basis of <em>istinbat</em> to the hadith that has the value of <em>sahih</em> or <em>hasan</em> which are both <em>ma’mul bih</em> (which can practice), although <em>al-hadi th ghayr al-mutawatirah</em> (a hadith not narrated by many narrators) and give benefits <em>yaqin</em>, and if <em>ghayr ma’mul bih</em> (cannot be practiced), then according to they are rejected as the basis of legal terms.</p>}, number={2}, journal={Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam}, author={Al Hadi, Abu Azam}, year={2020}, month={Dec.}, pages={316–339} }