Measuring the Executorial Power of the Constitutional Court of the Republic Indonesia Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2023.13.2.230-247Keywords:
Executorial Power, Constitutional Norms, Constitutional CourtAbstract
This study aims to measure the binding strength of the Constitutional Court's decision in constitutional review cases and to analyze the juridical implications of normalizing norms declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. This research is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a concept approach, and a case approach. The Legislative Approach is used to make an inventory of laws and regulations relating to the position and authority of the Constitutional Court. The conceptual approach analyses legal issues based on concepts related to the executive power of the Constitutional Court's decision. The case approach is used as an object in this research, namely the findings of the Constitutional Court, which are not followed up. The results show that the Constitutional Court's decisions are normatively final and binding, but in reality, several Constitutional Court decisions are not followed up by the legislators; this gives the impression that the Constitutional Court's findings do not have an executive nature. The juridical implication of the normalization of norms is declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. Juridically the model does not have binding legal force, and the cancellation of the legal standard must be carried out.
Downloads
References
Amiruddin dan Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Arto, Mukti. Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.
Barjamaj, Ina Foto, and Alba Robert Dumi. “Forced Execution of Judicial Decisions as the Right to Fair Trial Applicability of This Principle in the Albanian Practice Cases That Are Handled by the Constitutional Court.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4, no. 9 (2013): 458–63. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n9p458.
Constitutional, T H E, and Court of. “The Constitutional Court of Azerbaijan Conference " Execution of The Decisions of Constitutional Courts : A Cornerstone of The Process of Implementation of Constitutional Justice " On The Occasion of The 10th Anniversary of The Constitutional Court of Az,” no. September (2008).
Fadjar, A. Mukthie. Hukum Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MK RI, 2006.
Frits, Rian Van. “Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Constitusional Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Mahkamah Agung.” MMH 44, no. 4 (2015): 512.
Gvozdetsky, Dmitry. “The Category of Certainty of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation’s Judgments as a Legal Standard for the Implementation of Its Decisions by the Courts.” SHS Web of Conferences 55 (2018): 02010. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185502010.
Hamilton, Alexander. The Federalism Ppaer” Dalam Maruarar Siahaan, Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Konstitusi Yang Hidup. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
Huda, Ni’matul. Negara Hukum, Demokrasi, Dan Judicial Review. Cetakan-1. Yogyakarta: UII PRESS, 2005.
Kelsen Hans. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Cetakan-1. Bandung: Penerbit Nuansa dan Penerbit Nusamedia, 2006.
Kusnardi, Moh. dkk. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara, 1988.
Levy, Leonard W. (ed). Judicial Review and the Supreme Court. Jakarta: Penerbit Nuansa, 2005.
Maulidi, M. Agus. “Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 340.
Maulidi, Mohammad Agus. “Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art2.
Mesraini. “Interkoneksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Mahkamah Agung: Studi Implementasi Putusan Tentang Nasab Anak.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar’i 4, no. 1 (2017): 21.
Palguna, Dewa Gede. Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dasar Pemikiran, Kewenangan, Dan Perbandingan Dengan Negara Lain. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2018.
Qamar, Nurul. “Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 1, no. Nomor 1 (2012): 2.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Du Contract Social (Perjanjian Sosial). Cetakan-1. Jakarta: Visimedia, n.d.
Samsul, Inosentius. Pengkajian Umum Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, 2009.
Syahrizal, Ahmad. “Problem Implementasi Putusan MK.” Jurnal Konstitusi 4, no. 1 (2007): 539.
Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “‘Pembangkangan’ Terhadap Putusan Mahakamah Konstitusi Kajian Putusan Nomor 153/G/2011/PTUN-JKT.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013): 227–49.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Yunus, Ahsan. “Analisis Sifat Final Dan Mengikat (Binding) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Konstitusi PKK Universitas Hasanudin Vol III, no. Nomor 2 (2011): 115–38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
