Interpreting Al-Bughāt and The Ethics of Nation State Citizenship

Authors

  • Muflikhatul khoiroh UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Abd Syakur UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.1-24

Keywords:

al-bughāt, al-ḥudūd, , al-muḥāribūn, jarīmah, ḥadd al-ḥirābah

Abstract

This article examines the al-bughāt phenomenon addressed to groups accusing the Indonesian state of being a taghut government. The study garnered primary sources from siyāsah fiqh books discussing al-bughāt. The data collected was analyzed using content analysis, and the results are as follows; al-bughāt is a justified state dissident. The concept of al-bughāt was born within the framework of jināyah fiqh, so it is classified in the ḥudūd criminal provisions. Al-bughāt, in the practical level of early Islamic politics, was in a political frame so that there was no provision for sanctions. Besides, jurists position al-bughāt as the authority of the Islamic state under the political model of the khilāfah, so it is not appropriate when applied in countries that do not adhere to Islamic principles, such as Indonesia. As for certain groups that accuse Indonesia of being a taghut country, they should be more appropriately positioned as deviants who should be facilitated with guidance and counseling. However, if they commit deadly destruction and bombing, they are placed as al-muḥāribūn, whose punishment status is in the al-ḥirābah category. 

Keywords: al-bughāt, al-ḥudūd, , al-muḥāribūn, jarīmah, ḥadd al-ḥirābah 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Abbās al-, Muhammad bi Abī. Nihāyah al-Muḥtāj fī al-Fiqh ‘alā Madhāhib al-Imām al-Shāfi’ī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, t.t.

Abidin, Zaenal. “Wahabisme, Transnasionalisme Dan Gerakan-Gerakan Radikal Islam Di Indonesia.” TASÂMUH 12, no. 2 (1 Juni 2015).

Awwa’ al-, Muhammad Sālim. Fī Uṣūl al-Niẓām al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī. Mesir: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 1983.

Aybash, Yūsuf. Nuṣūṣ al-Fikr al-Siyāsī al-Islāmī. Beirūt: Dār al-Ṭalīqah, 1986.

Bukhārī al-, Imām. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, t.t.

Departemen Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahnya. 10 ed. Bandung: CV Diponegoro, 2004.

Farra’ al-, al-Qāḍī Abū Ya’lā Muhammad bin al-Ḥusayn. al-Ahkām al-Ṣulṭāniyyah. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1994.

Harissalam, Harissalam. “Perspective Imam Madzhab on Bughat Elements.” JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2020).

Ḥusaynī al-, Taqīy al-Dīn Abū Bakar bin Muhammad. Kifāyah al-Akhyār fī Ḥal al-Ghāyat al-Ikhtiṣar. Jakarta: Dār Iḥya’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyah Indonesia, 1994.

Ibn Humam. Ḥāshiyah al-Shaibānī. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub, t.t.

Ibn Kathīr, al-Imām Abū al-Fidā’ Ismā’īl. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Adhīm. Mekkah: Dār al-Baz, 1987.

Jannah, Hasmita. “Tinjauan psikologis tentang anarkisme dan Bughat.” Jurnal Psikologi Terapan (JPT) 2, no. 1 (2021).

Johan, Eva. “Kebijakan Indonesia Terhadap Imigran Ilegal Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kedaulatan Negara.” Yuridika 28, no. 1 (2013).

Marāghī al-, Aḥmad Muṣṭafā. Tafsīr al-Marāghī. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, t.t.

Māwardiy al-, Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Ali ibn Ḥabīb. al-Nukat wa al-‘Uyūn. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, t.t.

Māwardiy al-, Abū Ḥasan ‘Ali ibn Ḥabīb. al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭānīyah. Beirūt: : Dār al-Fikr, 1992.

Muqaddasi al-, Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Qudāmah. al-Mugnī fi Fiqh al-Imām Ahmad bin Hanbal al-Shaibani. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, 1994.

Muslim, al-Imām. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Bandung: Dahlan, t.t.

Na’im an-, Abdullah Ahmed. Dekonstruksi Syari’ah: Wacana Kebebasan Sipil, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Hubungan Internasional dalam Islam. Diterjemahkan oleh Ahmad Suaedy dan Amirudin Rany ar-. IV. Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2004.

Qaṭṭān al-, Mannā’. Mabāḥith fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Mekkah: Mansurat al-’Asr al-Ḥadīth, t.t.

Raḥīm al- ʻAk, Khalid Abd. Ṣafwah al-Bayān li Maʻāni al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Kairo: Dār al-Salām, 1994.

Ramli al-, Shihābuddin. Mughnī al-Muḥtāj. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1982.

Raziq al-, Alī Abd. al-Islām wa Uṣūl al-Ḥukm. Beirūt: al-Muassasah al-‘Arabiyah li al-Dirāsah wa al-Nashr, 1987.

Sāyis al-, Muhammad Alī. Tafsīr Āyāt Aḥkām. Mekkah: Matba’ah Muhammad Ali Sabi’ah, t.t.

Shuhbah, Muhammad bin Muhammad Abū. al-Ḥudūd fī al-Islām. Kairo: Salsalah al-Buḥūth, 1974.

Sumardi, Dedy. “Hudûd Dan HAM: Artikulasi Penggolongan Hudûd Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im.".” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 35, no. 2 (2011).

Ṭabrāniy al-. al-Mu’jam al-Ausaṭ. Vol. VI, t.t.

Zamakhshariy al-, Imam Abu al-Qāsim ‘Umar bin Muhammad. Tafsīr al-Kashshāf. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, 1995.

Zuḥaylī al-, Wahbah. al-Fiqh al-Islām wa Adillatuhu. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1989.

Zuhayliy, Wahbah al-. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmiy wa Adillatuh. III. Vol. VI. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1989.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

khoiroh, M., & Syakur, A. . (2022). Interpreting Al-Bughāt and The Ethics of Nation State Citizenship. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.1-24

Issue

Section

Articles