The Dynamic Problems of Polygamy Cases in Indonesia:

The Showcase of Juridical Authority, Implementation of Contra Legem and Fiqh Argumentations

Authors

  • Nabiela Naily UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • A. Kemal Riza UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ta’mirotul Biroroh UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.51-75

Keywords:

polygamy, juridical authority, contra legem

Abstract

Abstract: One issue that remains a stumble block for modernization of Islamic family law is polygamy. In Indonesia, polygamy is restricted, but not completely forbidden. Husbands who have desires for polygamy should fulfill requirements before the court of justice. However, there is a tendency among judges of Islamic courts nowadays to grant permission for them to practice polygamy although not all of those husbands meet the requirements as outlined by the Marriage Law. The judges argue that according to Article 5 the Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Authority they have the right and are obliged to deliver justice at all costs. Therefore, they grant permission for polygamy not only on the
basis of the corresponding the Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, but also on the authority of rechtsvinding, Islamic jurisprudence or fiqh as living law concept, and contra legem theory, a progressive implementation of legal value.
Keywords: polygamy, juridical authority, contra legem

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Manan. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana Pernada Media Grup, 2012.

Adeng Irawan, Interview, Surabaya, 1 June 2021. Surabaya,.

the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesia.

Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 0402/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Sda., 2016.

Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 1078/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sda., 2021.

Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 3765/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Sda., 2019.

Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 6186/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Sby., 2020.

“Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 728/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Sby., 2020.

Elkarimah, MIA. “Telaah Poligami Perspektif Syahrur; KHI & Undang –Undang Perkawinan Indonesia.” Hukum Islam 18, no. 1 (October 26, 2018).

Gelgel, Luh Gede Siska Dewi, and I Made Sarjana. “Pelaksanaan Contra Legem Oleh Hakim Penjabaran Nilai Hukum Progresif.” Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 10 (2013).

Halim, Abdul, and Ijtihad Hakim. “Ijtihad Hakim Dalam Penerapan Konsep Contra Legem Pada Penetapan Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama.” Legitima 1, no. 2 (2019).

Joint Decree of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Chairperson of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 047/KMA/SKB/IV/2009 - 02/SKB/P.KY/IV/2009 Concerning Guidelines for Enforcing the Code.

Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, https://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=849:penemuan-hukum-oleh-hakim-rechtvinding&catid=108&Itemid=161&lang=en.

Law Number 14 of 1970 Concerning Main Provisions of Judicial Power.

Law Number 48 of 2009 Concerning Judicial Power.

Law Number 50 of 2009 Concerning the Second Amendment To Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Court.

Law Number 7 the Year 1989 Concerning Religious Justice.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 the Year 1974 Concerning Marriage.

M. Yahya Harahap. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Manan, Bagir. Menjadi Hakim Yang Baik. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung-RI, 2007.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum, Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007.

Moh. Jumhari, Interview, Surabaya, 20 April 2021.

Mubarok, Interview, Surabaya, 05 September 2021.

Naily, Nabiela. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Indonesia. 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.

———. “Perlindungan Perempuan Dan Anak Dalam Hukum Keluarga Di Dunia Islam.” Islamic Studies, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2021.

———. Recent Polemics on the Status of Women and Children Outside Registered Marriage in Indonesia: Muslim Reponses towards MK’s Decision No. 46/PUU-VII/2010. Bangkok: Thai Research Fund, 2014.

Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 1991 Concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law.

Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim : Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Rogaiyah. “Putusan Contra Legem Sebagai Implementasi Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Di Peradilan Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Nomor 16 K/AG/2010 Dan Putusan Kasasi Nomor 110 K/AG/2007)”.” Qiyas 3, no. 2.

Rojikin, Umar. “Penerapan Asas Contra Legem Pada Kasus Izin Poligami Di Pengadilan Agama Cianjur.” UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Sam’un. “Asas Monogami Terbuka Dalam Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia.” Al-Hukama’ : The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 05, no. 1 (2015).

Wicaksana, Yuristyawan Pambudi. “Implementasi Asas Ius Curia Novit Dalam Penafsiran Hukum Putusan Hakim Tentang Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 3, no. 1 (2018).

Zefry, Interview, Surabaya, 1 January 2021.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Naily, N., Riza, A. K. ., & Biroroh, T. . (2022). The Dynamic Problems of Polygamy Cases in Indonesia:: The Showcase of Juridical Authority, Implementation of Contra Legem and Fiqh Argumentations. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 12(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.51-75

Issue

Section

Articles