Isbat Nikah Pernikahan Poligami secara Siri dalam Putusan Nomor 3401/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Sby
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v5i1.325Keywords:
Contra Legem, Poligami, Kawin Siri, hukum IslamAbstract
Abstract: In Indonesia, many cases of polygamy are carried out in series, so to register polygamy requires marriage isbat. On the other hand, polygamous marriages must obtain permission from the court. Based on this, this article aims to review the Surabaya Religious Court Decision Number 3401/Pdt.G/2022/PA. Sby about isbat nikah for husbands who practice polygamy in siri (secret). This research is normative juridical research. Data was collected from rulings laws and regulations on marriage and polygamy. In addition, data is supported from books or journals. The collected data were analyzed with a deductive mindset that the data on isbat nikah for polygamous marriages were serially analyzed under law. The study concluded that judges had several considerations for granting isbat requests from serial polygamous marriages. From a philosophical point of view, the decision prioritizes the acquisition of rights that must be owned by the Petitioners. However, from the juridical side, the Panel of Judges is considered to have committed contra legem actions by overriding SEMA rule Number 3 of 2018. Because, indirectly, the Surabaya Religious Court Judges justify an act that has deviated and violated the law.Keywords: Contra legem, polygamy, siri marriage, Islamic law.
Abstrak: Di Indonesia banyak kasus poligami yang dilakukan secara siri, sehingga untuk mencatatkan poligami tersebut dibutuhkan isbat nikah. Di sisi lain pernikahan poligami harus mendapatkan izin dari pengadilan. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, maka artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji Putusan Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Nomor 3401/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Sby tentang isbat nikah bagi suami yang melakukan poligami secara siri. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Data dikumpulkan dari putusan dan peraturan perundang undangan tentang isbat nikah dan poligami. Selain itu data didukung dari buku atau jurnal. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan pola pikir deduktif bahwa data tentang isbat nikah bagi pernikahan poligami secara siri dianalisis dengan hukum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hakim memiliki beberapa pertimbangan untuk mengabulkan permohonan isbat dari perkawinan poligami siri. Ditinjau dari sisi filosofis, putusan tersebut mengedepankan perolehan hak-hak yang harus dimiliki oleh Para Pemohon. Namun, dari sisi yuridis Majelis Hakim dinilai telah melakukan tindakan contra legem dengan mengesampingkan aturan SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. Sebab, secara tidak langsung Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Surabaya membenarkan suatu perbuatan yang telah menyimpang dan melanggar hukum. Kata Kunci: Contra Legem, Poligami, Kawin Siri, hukum IslamReferences
A. Djazuli. Fikih (Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-Masalah Yang Praktis). 8. Jakarta: Pranadamedia Group, n.d.
Abdul Hakim. “Reasons for Polygamy and Its Impact on Muslim Family Life: Experiences of Polygamous Perpetrators in Babat, Lamongan, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 1 (2022): 34–53. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i1.529.
Abdul Mukti Thabrani. “Maqâshid Revitalization in Global Era: Istidlâl Study from Text to Context.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (2018): 310–33. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v13i2.1814.
Ahmadi, Rizqa, Lilik Rofiqoh, and Wildani Hefni. “Brands of Piety? Islamic Commodification of Polygamous Community in Indonesia.” JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM 16, no. 1 (June 1, 2022): 153. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2022.16.1.153-174.
Buku II Pedoman Teknis Administrasi Dan Teknis Peradilan Agama Tahun 2008, n.d.
Dewi Khurin ‘In, Miftahul Muta’alimin, Akmal Maulana, and Nur Lailatul Musyafa’ah. “Perceraian Akibat Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 18–37. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v3i1.114.
Eva F. Nisa. “The Bureaucratization of Muslim Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 33, no. 2 (2018): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2018.28.
Hadi, Mukhammad Nur. “The Narrative of Protecting Polygamous Women in Indonesia’s Digital World: Between Moderate and Conservative Muslims.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 15, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 161. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2022.15201.
Hasan, Hamka, Asep S. Jahar, Nasaruddin Umar, and Irwan Abdullah. “Polygamy: Uncovering the Effect of Patriarchal Ideology on Gender-Biased Interpretation.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 78, no. 4 (December 20, 2022). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7970.
Muhammad Ihsan Fauzi. “Penanganan Perkara Permohonan Itsbat Nikah Poligami Secara Siri Berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018.” Mutawasith 4 (December 25, 2021).
Mukhammad Nur Hadi, Latifatul Islamiyah, and Cecep Soleh Kurniawan. “Conservatism on Islamic Legal Maxims: Judicial Interpretation of Polygamous Marriage at the Religious Courts of Mojokerto, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 2 (2023): 172–96. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i2.1637.
Mukhtaruddin Bahrum. “Problematika Isbat NIkah Poligami Sirri.” Jurnal Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 4 (July 2, 2019): 213.
Nasrun Haroen. Ushul Fiqh I. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, n.d.
Nur Lailatul Musyafa’ah, Tania Ayu Komala Sari, Athifatul Wafirah, and Sagita Destia Ramadhan. “Family Dispute Resolution in The Sakinah Family Consultation and Counseling Bureau Surabaya-Indonesia.” Maqasidi: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.vi.948.
“Pernikahan Siri Janda Atau Duda Dari Aparatur Sipil Negara Perspektif Maqasid Al-Shari’ah.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 4, no. 4 (2023): 312–30. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v4i4.142.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VII/2010, n.d.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Nomor: 3401/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Sby. sipp.pa-surabaya.go.id, 2022.
Safira Putri Cahyani, Siti Winariyah, Wiwik Andriyani, Drajat, Samudra Pangestu, and Zakiyatul Ulya. “Studi Komparasi Prosedur Pencatatan Dan Perkawinan Indonesia Dan Malaysia.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 4, no. 3 (2023): 216–33. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v4i3.240.
SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018, n.d.
Sheila Fakhria. “Menyoal Legalitas Nikah Sirri (Analisis Metode Istiṣlāḥiyyah).” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 9, no. 2 (2016): 185–200. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2016.09204.
Siti Aminah. “Hukum Nikah Di Bawah Tangan (Nikah Siri).” Cendekia 12, no. 1 (2014): 21–29.
Sudirman. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Parepare: IAIN Parepare Sulawesi Selatan, 2021.
Syamsul Bahri. Relevansi Alasan Pengajuan Itsbat Nikah. badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id, 2019. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/relevansi-alasan-pengajuan-itsbat-nikah-oleh-syamsul-bahri-s-hi-10-3.
Tarigan, Azhari Akmal, Nurhayati Nurhayati, and Watni Marpaung. “Taming Islam’s Polygyny Law: Revealing Male Sexual Desire in Indonesia’s Polygyny Practices.” JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM 15, no. 1 (June 1, 2021): 149. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2021.15.1.149-170.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama, n.d.
“Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan,” n.d.
Zikri Darussamin, Armansyah, and Ahmad Zikri. “The Urgency of Maturity to Get Married and Its Relevance to Family Life Goals.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 215–36. https://dx.doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.5324
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nadhifa Salsabilla Syafa’, Nur Lailatul Musyafaah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Ma'mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum agree to the following terms: Creative Commons License Ma'mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 2. Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation. 3. Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 4. Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
