Ensuring Equity in Post-Divorce Economic Rights

A Critical Analysis of Judicial Sensitivity in the Religious Court of Padang Sidimpuan, Indonesia

Authors

  • Azhari Akmal Tarigan Univeristas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution Univeristas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Syahrial Arif Hutagalung Univeristas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Syafran Arrazy Prefectural University of Kumamoto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.2.181-202

Keywords:

Judge, Sensitivity, Breadwinner, Alimony.

Abstract

Judges are pivotal in issuing impartial decisions that advocate for women, even when they function as primary providers. This study examines the judicial sensitivity towards women as primary breadwinners within families in Padang Lawas Utara. Employing a sociological approach, the research explores the realities among the indigenous people of Padang Lawas Utara. Subsequently, it conducts a comprehensive review of five decisions from the Religious Court of Padang Sidimpuan, falling under the jurisdiction of Padang Lawas Utara. The article reveals that the judges fail to consider the wife’s familial role, especially the role of the wife as the breadwinner. They concentrate solely on the male’s capabilities and rely on evidence of the husband’s income, which proves challenging to validate. Despite the husband’s ownership of assets, including land, houses, rice fields, vehicles, and others, the judge refrains from exercising the ex officio rights to provide the wife's māḍiyah (previous alimony). This underscores the inadequacy of the judge’s sensitivity in establishing the fulfillment and protection of women’s rights, particularly in the context of post-divorce scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

As’ad, Kamran, and Mufiliha Wijayatin. Membangun Keluarga Qur’an, Panduan Untuk Wanita Muslimah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2005.

Ash Shiddieqy, Hasbi. Fiqih Islam Mempunyai Daya Elastis Lengkap Bulat Dan Tuntas. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1975.

Asiah, Nur. “HAK ASASI MANUSIA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 15, no. 1 (2017): 55–66.

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. Hukum Perkawinan Islam. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 1999.

Cholil, Mufidah, and Sudirman Sudirman. “GENDER EQUALITY IN ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW: Breaking the Chain of Domestic Violence to Achieve Harmonious Family.” Kafa`ah: Journal of Gender Studies 9, no. 2 (December 27, 2019): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.15548/jk.v9i2.270.

Fathurrahman, Nandang. “PERBANDINGAN KEWAJIBAN NAFKAH PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 3, no. 2 (2022): 193–206.

Hammad, Muchammad. “Hak-Hak Perempuan Pasca Perceraian: Nafkah Iddah Talak Dalam Hukum Keluarga Muslim Indonesia , Malaysia , Dan.” Jurnal Al-Ahwal 7, no. 1 (2014): 51–52.

Jalaludin, Ahmad. “Budaya Hukum Bias Gender Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak.” MUWAZAH 7, no. 2 (2015): 205–6.

Jannah, Hasanatul. “KOMPETENSI HUKUM PEMENUHAN NAFKAH ISTRI PASCA PERCERAIAN.” De Jure, Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2010): 71–79.

Kholidah, Muhammad Ridho, Sobhan, and Mahyudin Ritongan. “Violation of Women’s Rights on Divorce: Study on Religious Court Decision.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 6 (2023): 1–17.

Khotimah, Khusnul. “Diskiminasi Gender Terhadap Perempuan Dalam Sektor Pekerjaan.” Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 4, no. 1 (2009): 2.

Maharani, Putri Ayu. “Menyoal Disparitas Produkhakim Pengadilan Agama Antara Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Legal Reasoning 1, no. 2 (2019): 131.

Mansari & Moriyanti. “Sensitivitas Hakim Terhadap Perlindungan Nafkah Isteri Pasca Perceraian.” Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies 5, no. 1 (2019): 46.

Mansour, Fakih. Analisis Gender Dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Insist Press, 2008.

Marwing, Anita. “Perlindungan Hak-Hak Perempuan Pasca Perceraian (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palopo).” PALITA: Journal of Social-Religi Research 1, no. 1 (2016): 47.

Najjad, Ridha Bak. Hak Dan Kewajiban Istri Dalam Islam. Jakarta: Lentera Basrimata, 2002.

Nasution, Muhammad Syukri Albani. “Analisis Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Tipologi Pelaksanaan Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Mandailing Natal.” Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2015): 31–50.

Nizar, Muchamad Choirun, Feria Tamara, and M. Noviani Ardi. “Between Work and Family: Multiple Role Strategies of Career Women in Sultan Agung Islamic University.” Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 13, no. 1 (June 20, 2023): 115–39. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.1.115-139.

Novita, Hariyanti. “HAK-HAK PEREMPUAN PASCA PERCERAIAN Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Padangsidimpuan.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2020.

Nurdin, Abidin. “Mut’ah and Iddah: Post-Divorce Payment Practices in Aceh.” In Women and Property Rights in Indonesian Islamic Legal Context, edited by John R. Bowen and Arskal Salim, 107–26. Leiden: Brill, 2019.

Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Women’s Financial Rights after Divorce in Indonesia.” In Women and Property Rights in Indonesian Islamic Legal Contexts, edited by John R. Bowen and Arskal Salim, 89–106. Leiden: Brill, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386297.

Ramdhaniar, Sofia and Artiawati. “Bertahan Menembus Tantangan Kehidupan: Studi Kasus Pada Perempuan Pencari Nafkah Utama.” Ristekdik (Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling) 5, no. 2 (2020): 204.

Rokhmad, Abu, and Sulistiyono Susilo. “Conceptualizing Authority of the Legalization of Indonesian Women’s Rights in Islamic Family Law.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 11, no. 2 (2017): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2017.11.2.489-508.

Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqhu As-Sunnah. Kairo: Dar al Fath li al-Alam, 2003.

Santoso, M. Agus. Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Preada Media Group, 2012.

Sarah, Dewi. “The Neglect of Post-Divorce Iddah Allowance: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Positive Law and Malasysia’s Islamic Family Law Act 1984,” 2016.

Saudi, Amran. “Protection of Women’s and Children’s Rights Based on System Interconnection: A New Paradigm of Execution of Women and Children’s Rights After Divorce.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 11, no. 3 (2022): 499–522.

Simbolon, Parlindungan. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pernikahan Adat Masyarakat Batak Muslim Di Kab. Padang Lawas Utara Sumatera Utara.” Al-Himayah 1, no. 2 (2017): 251–60.

Siti Musdah Mulia ed. Keadilan Dan Kesetaraan Jender (Perspektif Islam). Jakarta: Tim Pemberdayaan Perempuan Bidang Agama Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, 2001.

Syarifuddin, Amir. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia: Antara Fiqh Munakahat Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.

Syarifuddin, Muhammad. AKSESIBILITAS KEADILAN BAGI PEREMPUAN DAN ANAK Peran Mahkamah Agung Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Perempuan Dan Anak Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Jakarta: Imaji Cipta Karya, 2020.

Velawati, Sisca Hadi. “Nafkah Madliyah Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Mei, no. Sarjana Ilmu Hukum (2015): 6.

Yuni, Lilik Andar, and Murjani Murjani. “Gender Sensitivity at Judge’s Verdicts in Samarinda and Magelang Religious Courts; The Implementation of PERMA Number 03 of 2017.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 15, no. 2 (20AD): 251–79. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v15i2.2714.

Interview

Harahap, Harisman. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Harahap, Syamsiah. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Pulungan, Syahputra. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Siagian. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Siregar, Halim. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Siregar, Hamdani. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Siregar, Sofyan. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Siregar, Suardi. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Sudrajad, Achmad Sofyan Aji. Interview, February 14, 2022.

Court Decisions

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 112/Pdt.G/2021/PA.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 142/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 176/Pdt.G/2020/PA

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 204/Pdt.G/ 2019/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 215/Rev.G/2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 22/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 265/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 296/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 305/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 310/Rev.G/2019/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 317/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 328/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 328/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 357/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 358/Pdt.G/ 2021/PA.Psp.

Padang Sidimpuan Religious Court 38/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Psp.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-08

How to Cite

Tarigan, A. A., Nasution, M. S. A. . ., Hutagalung, S. A., & Arrazy, S. . (2023). Ensuring Equity in Post-Divorce Economic Rights: A Critical Analysis of Judicial Sensitivity in the Religious Court of Padang Sidimpuan, Indonesia. AL-HUKAMA: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 13(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.2.181-202